HOME NEWS MAGAZINE MANIFESTO CONTACT ARCHIVE SHOP
 

Hand Shaking Given Shakedown

hand

Modern youngsters are eschewing the handshake as the customary greeting and parting gesture. They are replacing it with a casual wave, a hug or by touching fists – in a nod to the tradition held by the rap musicians they listen to. The custom of shaking hands dates back to medieval times, when it was used as a peaceful greeting between knights; the open hand showed they were not holding any weapon.

A poll revealed that 74 per cent of adults shake hands less often than they used to, while only 45 per cent of the under-25s do so. The chief objection is on hygienic grounds. Touching another’s palm is seen as an opportunity for diseases such as the Ebola virus and porcine influenza to spread.

The research was carried out by Dr David Holmes of Manchester Metropolitan University, who called for the handshake to continue: “In our evolutionary past, touch was the foundation of families and civilised coexistence, helping to reduce stress, violence and dissent. As a type of ritualised touching, the handshake is one of the few forms of public physical contact that still survives today.”

Dr Holmes had noted six types of handshake that could be used to identify the personality traits of the shaker. They include the ‘Shake and Smacker’, as used by television interviewers, where the handshake is the initial contact to be followed by a kiss between the two. The ‘Single Sting’ is favoured by world leaders – a quick, formal shake which may seem terse but allows a lot more hands to be shaken in rapid succession. Then there is ‘The Back Slapper’, where the handshake is accompanied by a simultaneous clap on the back. This is favoured by celebrities and can have a patronizing air.

Criminals will use a handshake as a method of displaying dominance over an accomplice. The handshake is a tad too firm and held far too long, indicating that the shaker is not to be messed with, “or else”. For those who want to make a gesture of defiance, there is also ‘The Snub’, where a proffered handshake is not met by the other person at all.

The Chap says: turn to the nearest person to you immediately and shake their hand, be they man, woman, child, invalid or foreigner. The only people one should not shake hands with are the staff, for fear of encouraging familiarity.


29 Comments »

Comment by A C-Clarke — February 4, 2010 @ 3:42 pm

Do other any chaps find the modern habit of embracing and kissing on greeting strangers a bit ripe? Give me a good honest handshake any day!


Comment by P. Emerson Humphrey — February 5, 2010 @ 3:29 am

The ‘The Back Slapper’ can also be a gesture of great affection and camaraderie and should not be sullied by celebrity usage. Also used to prevent the ‘upper hand’ among politicians in photographs.

You fail to mention ‘The double hander’ where the second hand is placed around the handshake proper to confer a warmer greeting and is shown, through studies, only to occur in humans and mutants of some primate species.


Comment by Brigadier T.E Barlow — February 5, 2010 @ 6:48 pm

Embracing and kissing! Sounds like what goes on on the continent.


Comment by Harrison Tweed — February 6, 2010 @ 10:21 am

Air kissing. The single hand grab and shoulder barge combination.All equally abhorrent to a dyed in the tweed chap in my opinion!


Comment by Michael Gutteridge — February 6, 2010 @ 1:20 pm

This is going to bugger things up for the freemasons.


Comment by Candy Toru — February 6, 2010 @ 6:19 pm

What about the finger crusher? Favoured by the weak of mind and cold of heart.


Comment by Jack Roche — February 6, 2010 @ 9:36 pm

i find that some narrow mindedness has been employed our european cousins have swapped salutations in this manner for centuries and they have managed to function perfect well i do say however that this should not go beyond personal friends the casual acquaintance and those whom we have never met before should expect a firm gentleman’s handshake as a formal recognition of one another.


Comment by Mike Arther — February 7, 2010 @ 9:17 am

Men hugging when greeting in public, sounds bit rum for my taste!
The Mamsarb and I have used the correct and only greeting for married couples.
On returning home from my office, I using a light hand take Mrs Arthur whilst kiss her on the check. This being the correct way to greet ones wife in the civilised world!

Men on the other hand should be taken firmly and looked at directly in the eye if posible!


Comment by Cyril Strideforth-Knickerbocker — February 8, 2010 @ 12:23 am

Whilst not wanting to seem utterly bereft of refinement and continental polish I must insist that if kissing be the order of the day one may be spared tounges. At least among men.
A “pip-pip” and a forefinger raised to the level of the forehead should suffice, what?
(Bloody foreigners!)


Comment by Helen — February 8, 2010 @ 10:54 am

In France and Spain, kissing varies by region, so sometimes it’s a one-kiss, sometimes a two-kiss (right-left), sometimes a triple (right-left-right) and sometimes a quadruple (right-left… you can guess the rest, I’m sure). Sometimes a hand shake and sometimes a back-slap gets chucked in for good measure.

This can lead to confusion and possibly offence if there are too many kisses or not enough. I would imagine this is the continental version of the “help! you’re crushing my phalanges!” or the “Blimey, that was a rather weak shake.”

It’s interesting to note that while we think the French are all rather passionate (hence ‘French kissing’) in Tudor times the French thought the English were a bit too passionate and men would greet with a kiss on the lips. But they also wore tights of course, so who are we to judge.


Comment by Robert Hugh Wrightson — February 11, 2010 @ 5:11 pm

I generally find a tip of the hat sufficient in most social situations. Which incidentally also stems from knightly times when a man at arms would open his visor to reveal his smiling face and good intentions. The military salute also comes from this gesture.


Comment by Capt. Arthur Posset — February 14, 2010 @ 10:46 pm

This is the sort of thing that brought about the 1960s… and we all know where that leads!


Comment by Arthur Anderson — February 15, 2010 @ 12:01 pm

Nothing wrong with a sturdy handshake, clearly. About the only foreigner greeting I find acceptable, to a point, is the clicking of the heels and a small bow. However, we do know where this can lead.


Comment by Rt Hon COmpton Dando — February 19, 2010 @ 4:38 pm

I must say, as the father of a son about to enter into his Chap years, I have been wondering how to introduce this gentlemanly topic for some time. The lad, being already of an admirably Chappist, if a little youthfully Steampunk, disposition, needs to understand the importance of the handshake, but having surpassed his old Pater in dimensions and strength, the careful balance of firmness and restraint is difficult for me to convey. I am grateful to The Chap for raising the subject.


Comment by Prof. Larry Askew — February 27, 2010 @ 12:09 pm

“The custom of shaking hands dates back to medieval times, when it was used as a peaceful greeting between knights; the open hand showed they were not holding any weapon.”

Bunkum! What rot! Before attaining the position depicted in the etching above, I should have palmed a blade with my off-hand. Using the handshake to pull my opponent toward me, unbalancing them and extending their occupied arm, my off-hand would then drive the blade up into the exposed armpit of my opponent’s on-arm.

It pays to be a bit handy. I’m up for parole in a month or two – anyone fancy a snifter?

Larry Askew, Professor of Medieval Death, Maudlin College, Oxbridge, c/o HMP Colander


Comment by Baskerville — March 5, 2010 @ 1:13 am

Air kissing?
Sounds all rather Johnny


Comment by Baskerville — March 5, 2010 @ 1:14 am

Air kissing?
Sounds all rather “Johnny foreigner” to me .


Comment by Lord Smuddger — March 14, 2010 @ 6:28 pm

Look here. It seems to me all you chaps are missing the point! Surley, a good old Buffalo handshake is the way to go, you knew you were shaking hands with a likeminded chap who’s intetions were strictly in acordance with chaps. No funny business, what.


Comment by Richard Sage — March 14, 2010 @ 10:53 pm

But as the Christmas edition of The Economist pointed out, shaking hands was not common amongst English friends (as opposed to business acquaintancies) until recently. I have certainly noticed this change over the last twenty years.


Comment by Sir Biskoff — March 15, 2010 @ 5:46 pm

Whilst I am saddened by the fading of a once glorious tradition, hand-shaking is something I no longer do, due to the prodigious volumes of “chaps” who discard personal hygiene and “forget” to wash their hands after micturation. A refusal to shake when offered is often taken as severe personal insult.

It has been shown, time and again, that very small droplets of urine coat the hands, no matter what a person claims about “not feeling anything”, and I for one think it is the height of bad manners to spread your urine on another.

Ergo, as sad as I am regarding the waning of this thoroughly chappist, traditional greeting, I am happier for it’s demise.


Comment by thewiseking — March 18, 2010 @ 6:32 pm

The proper handshake consists of a good firm grasp and pump with eye contact immediately followed by a chlorhexidine scrub or 95% isopropanol gel application.


Comment by Robert Sullivan Esq. — March 22, 2010 @ 2:07 pm

I will have none of this “un-hygenic” claptrap about shaking hands. The whole world is un-hygenic, and we’re not all dying of cholera!

I continue to shake hands with everyone who I deem worthy, and I continue to have my hand shaken in return. It is the first step in establishing familiarity with other chaps, and I greatly resent its demise!


Comment by Bespoke Shirt Makerq — March 27, 2010 @ 10:58 pm

Damned uncivilised these young chappies if you ask me.


Comment by Blogsworthy-Smythe — April 27, 2010 @ 5:11 am

All this kissing and hugging… damn Frog influence if you ask me.. bunch of cheese eating surrender monkeys…


Comment by Darren Jackson — June 6, 2010 @ 1:46 pm

The good lord gave us hands to shake not to hug and kiss each other like bloody primates. What in hell’s teeth is happening to these blighters? I blame the bloody French, ‘Never trust a Frenchie unless he’s in the sights of your winchester’ my Father used to say to me, damn right he was too.


Comment by A passing Frog — June 19, 2010 @ 11:36 pm

I may be a bloody Frenchie (one gets used to it and one would rather not change at one’s advanced age) but I was always taught that a man never shakes a lady’s hand, unless said lady first proffers her own right hand, after ungloving same, of course.
As to the “cheese eating surrender monkey” comment above, one must surmise it comes from a former colonial of a right-wing republican persuasion, who, like most of his brethren, unfortunately combines ignorance of the world beyond North American shores with a level of arrogance justified neither by his intellect nor by his achievements. Very sad.


Comment by The Rt Hon Lord Hugo Reginald Watford-Gap QC MP DCL GBE GCSE HND DSS(Cantab) DWP(Oxon) — June 23, 2010 @ 10:15 pm

I for one follow the thinking behind that Diva of Chavettes, the late Ms Jade Cerisa Lorraine Goody of Upshire, in her somewhat controversial remarks espoused in that reprehensible concoction of an excuse for a social experimentation/ neo voyeurism aka “Big Brother”. During the same in her remarks about a fellow contestant’s hygene habits she observed “you never know where her hands have been”.

In this day and age where the spectre of Mrs A (MRSA) haunts every horspital’s corridor, the unecessary engagement of bodily contact, is akin to engaging in coitus without one’s socks on (both metaphorically and literally speaking!!).

I for one favour the conventions of the Tuvalu peoples as a welcome alternative. Without wishing to sound like a Mackintosh-wearing purveyor of obscene publications, they like to greet one another by having a “good ‘ole sniff”. Although fellow readers would be well-advised to steer the salutation towards the face rather than the armpits.

Better still, and I should say more in keeping with the Chappist spirit, the Mongolians prefer to greet by the sharing of a pipe. Who says they are barbarians. Good ho Mr G Khan, that’s the right idea.


Comment by D'Bottreaux — July 28, 2010 @ 12:30 pm

This touching of knuckles is creeping more and more into the game of golf at all levels. It is deplorable to watch Tiger Woods et al at the Open touching knuckles with their caddies after each shot….and what’s more I even saw it occuring at my club the very next day between MEMBERS! Downright uncivilised.


Comment by Sir Barnaby Damascus Bumblecock (Q.C) — July 29, 2010 @ 4:26 pm

In my day, one could expect to have been buggered for such homosexualist behaviour.

What next? Cockfighting in the club?


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment